Clouded Optimism in China’s Markets

Key Takeaways

  • Despite a stock market rally, China’s economy faces significant challenges, including slowing growth, a property crisis, and weakening corporate earnings, creating a disconnect between investor sentiment and economic reality

  • Alibaba’s growth is under pressure from declining e-commerce profitability, heavy debt issuance, and intensifying competition, casting doubt on the sustainability of its AI-driven strategy

  • Alibaba’s AI ambitions reflect broader structural issues in China, where state-driven initiatives often result in overcapacity and limited long-term returns for individual companies

China’s recent stock markets rally has been attracting global investor attention. Yet, a closer look at the economy reveals a contradictory story.

China, the world’s second largest economy, has shown signs of a deepening slowdown in recent months, with key indicators like retail sales, industrial output, and fixed-asset investment all missing expectations. A prolonged property crisis and waning consumer demand are fueling this downward spiral, further exacerbated by the challenges of a stubborn deflationary cycle, in our view.

The government’s attempts to revive the economy through interest rate cuts and targeted stimulus have failed to meaningfully boost private investment or consumer spending. A major drag on fixed-asset investment is the renewed slump in the property sector, with August data revealing a ~13% year-over-year drop—the steepest decline since the pandemic’s onset in 2020.1 On-the-ground sentiment remains grim, as new home starts plunged 20% and new sales fell 11% in August, underscoring the sector’s deepening struggles.2

Even exports, which had been a rare bright spot in China’s growth earlier this year, slowed to 4.4% in August from 7.2% in July, falling short of expectations—a clear sign that the impact of 50% US tariffs is starting to weigh more heavily on trade.2 So far, Beijing has managed to offset the decline in shipments to the US by increasing trade with other regions, but the sustainability of this growth remains uncertain as politicians in key markets, such as the EU and Southeast Asia, increasingly advocate for protectionist policies and diversify their supply chains away from China.

Source: GQG Partners LLC (charts), CEIC, Autonomous Research (data). Data through August 2025. Total new starts by area, Primary market property sales, and Property investment data are based on growth rates derived from official nominal data, which differ from new official growth rates.

Poor economic activities are straining the Chinese government’s fiscal receipts, with Autonomous Research analysts projecting the deficit to surge to 9.3% of GDP in 2025—a significantly elevated level compared to Beijing’s target of 4%. This widening fiscal gap is severely limiting Beijing’s ability to deploy aggressive fiscal measures, even as the economy faces mounting pressures and risks of a broader slowdown.

Foreign Investors Overlooking the Data

It is hard to ignore the stark contrast between a rapidly slowing Chinese economy and the rally in China and Hong Kong stock markets since late June. We think weakening macro fundamentals are making share prices increasingly susceptible to a correction, though the influx of domestic institutional money into Chinese equities could extend this divergence.

In our view, investors are ignoring the fact that the corporate earnings picture is very soft, among other concerning signs. For example, banks have not fully recognized non-performing loans, so the real picture may be far different than what foreign investors perceive.

Another factor fueling the exuberance is the record-breaking level of margin trading, with the outstanding balance of stocks purchased with borrowed funds now surpassing $320 billion.3 Ultimately, we think the test will lie in corporate earnings, which are likely to face headwinds as economic growth continues to decelerate.

What about Alibaba Group? 

We believe this economic uncertainty and weak earnings extends directly to China’s corporate giants, and Alibaba Group is no exception. While its shares have surged more than 70% year to date, driven by market excitement over advancements in AI chip development and cloud buildup, the underlying fundamentals suggest a less rosy outlook. From narrowing e-commerce margins and intensifying regulatory pressures to a looming cash crunch driven by colossal AI investments, the landscape for Alibaba is far less optimistic than the market’s current exuberance suggests.

At its core, Alibaba remains a company reliant on cash flow from its mature e-commerce operations, which has bankrolled its expansion into high-growth areas like cloud computing and AI. But this approach raises uncomfortable questions: Can Alibaba realistically sustain its AI ambitions while battling cutthroat instant-delivery rivals, especially as its free cash flow deteriorates? Moreover, with the company increasingly resorting to massive bond issuances to fund its growth, how long before its debt-fueled strategy catches up with it? Investors would be wise to question whether the current rally is built on solid fundamentals—or merely on speculative optimism.

Revenue Growth Slows, Non-GAAP Net Income Falls

In the June quarter of 2025 (Q1 FY2026), Alibaba fell short of Wall Street’s revenue expectations, reporting a modest 2% year-over-year increase in total revenue to CNY247.7 billion ($34.8B), compared to analysts’ projections of CNY252.9 billion ($35.6B). This tepid growth underscores the broader stagnation and subdued consumer spending in China. The primary driver of growth was Alibaba Cloud, their comparatively small (~13% of revenue) segment which saw revenue accelerate by 26% in the quarter, fueled by strong demand for AI-related products and services. However, this was offset by a 28% revenue decline in the company’s “all others” segment–an assortment of ancillary businesses, including Cainiao (logistics) and Amap (navigation)–which makes up ~24% of their topline figure.4,5

Though net income came in more than expected, up 78% year over year, it was mainly driven by the company’s equity investments and the sale of its Trendyol local consumer services unit. Excluding these factors, Alibaba’s operating profit dropped 3% year over year, and its adjusted non-GAAP net income tumbled during the quarter.5

Source: GQG Partners LLC (chart), Jefferies (data). Data as of 21 September 2025. Content does not constitute investment advice and no investment decision should be made based on it. FY26 includes estimates. Actual results may differ from any projections illustrated above.

E-commerce Profitability Erosion Amid Competition:

Revenues from its core China e-commerce, which consists of Taobao and Tmall, rose 10% to CNY140 billion ($19.7B) in the latest quarter, representing an acceleration from low-single-digit growth in previous quarters. However, revenue growth did not translate into earnings growth. Alibaba’s adjusted earnings in this division plummeted 21% year over year, driven by heavy investments in instant commerce with competitors.5

After fighting competition from low-priced platforms such as PDD and Douyin, Alibaba has now found itself embroiled in a price war with more formidable rivals, namely JD.com and Meituan. In July, Alibaba announced that it would invest 50 billion yuan (US$7 billion) over 12 months through a subsidy program to boost its instant commerce services.

Intensifying Regulatory Risks in China:

Alibaba founder Jack Ma has reportedly re-emerged from years of seclusion, which began when the company came under regulatory scrutiny, and he is now taking a more active role in shaping Alibaba’s strategy, particularly in its artificial intelligence initiatives.6

At the same time, China’s top market regulator has intensified efforts to rein in “disorderly competition” and excessive subsidies within the instant-commerce sector. In July, the State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR) summoned major platforms, including Alibaba’s ele.me, Meituan, and JD.com, to enforce compliance with laws and regulations, prevent harmful competition, and promote industry fairness. All three platforms pledged to resist “vicious subsidies,” improve service quality, prioritize food safety, and support merchants and delivery riders.7 Still, despite these commitments, the price war rages on.

For Alibaba, which recently marked the end of a three-year “rectification” process for its anti-monopoly violations—culminating in a $2.8 billion fine—a pressing dilemma looms: Should it continue engaging in the ongoing price war to defend its e-commerce stronghold, or risk ceding ground to aggressive rivals?

High AI Investments Strain Cash Reserves:

Encouraged by the success of DeepSeek earlier this year, Alibaba is accelerating its AI initiatives with an ambitious CNY380 billion (US$53 billion) investment plan over the next three years. The bulk of this investment will be allocated to data centers and related technologies, including the chips essential for AI development and deployment.6

Unlike its US counterparts, Alibaba is adopting a far more expensive approach by developing chips in house—a strategy driven by US government export controls. T-head, Alibaba’s internal chip design subsidiary, has made notable progress by creating chips capable of supporting both inferencing and post-training processes. Alibaba, ByteDance, and DeepSeek are among the three most used general-purpose large models by Chinese enterprises.8

In the latest quarter ending June, the company’s capital expenditure on AI and cloud infrastructure surged 220% year over year to CNY39 billion (US$5.5 billion).5 At the same time, China’s entire AI application annual recurring revenue was at a mere US$1.5 billion as of August 2025, according to Goldman Sachs.9

As a result, Alibaba’s aggressive spending on AI and instant commerce has significantly strained its cash position. Its net cash generated from operating activities totaled CNY20.7 billion (US$2.9 billion), a 39% decline from the same period of 2024. Free cash flow, a non-GAAP liquidity metric, recorded an outflow of CNY18.8 billion (US$2.6 billion), in sharp contrast to the inflow of CNY17 billion (US$2.4 billion) during the same quarter last year.5

However, in China, tokens and cloud services have become increasingly commoditized, keeping prices persistently low. With no game-changing AI applications on the horizon, it raises the question of how long these Internet giants will continue pouring billions into acquiring GPUs and building out infrastructure.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio Creeps Up 

To fund its expansion, Alibaba has increasingly turned to the bond market. In July 2025, the company issued HK$12 billion (US$1.5 billion) in zero-coupon exchangeable bonds, allowing holders to exchange them for shares in its subsidiary, Alibaba Health Information Technology.10 Following this, in September, Alibaba announced plans to raise $3.2 billion through zero-coupon convertible bonds. These funds are aimed at enhancing its cloud and AI capabilities.11

As a result, Alibaba’s debt-to-equity ratio has climbed to approximately 25%, likely reaching its highest point since 2018. Nevertheless, the market can expect more bond offerings from Alibaba soon.12

Is the Rally Justified?

We believe that the market’s excitement around Alibaba’s AI advancements and cloud buildup may be overlooking critical challenges. While the promise of AI breakthroughs is undoubtedly alluring, investors should question whether the company’s current rally is built on solid fundamentals or speculative optimism. In a slowing economy where corporates and consumers are all tightening their belts, Alibaba’s reliance on e-commerce cash flow to bankroll its AI ambitions appears increasingly dubious. Add to this a mounting pile of debt and intensifying competition, and the risks become difficult to ignore.

Despite all the excitement, there has been no earnings growth with Alibaba. In fact, earnings estimates have been revised downward this year, as has been the case in previous years. We think the Chinese market has done well simply because of multiple expansion and forward PE is on the higher side of the long-term range while estimates have been trimmed again recently.

As long-time observers of China, we remain intrigued by how swiftly market leaders can be disrupted, whether due to regulatory pressures or the emergence of fierce competition. A prime example is Pinduoduo, which seemingly came out of nowhere to capture a significant share of the e-commerce market. Against this backdrop, we view Alibaba’s ambition to position itself as a leader in artificial intelligence as somewhat misplaced. Here is a legacy company attempting to compete not only with a wave of aggressive AI startups—often referred to as “AI tigers”—developing their own models and applications but also with established giants like Huawei, ByteDance, Tencent, and Baidu.

History suggests that state-driven industry support in China often leads to overcapacity, benefiting the broader economy but rarely translating into sustained stock market returns for individual companies. We have seen this dynamic play out repeatedly, such as in the solar energy sector, where aggressive capacity expansion ultimately led to significant value destruction for many firms. Alibaba’s foray into AI risks following a similar path, as competition intensifies and the market grows increasingly saturated.

In this context, the government’s emphasis on advancing AI—highlighted by the State Council’s high-level directive on implementing the “AI Plus” policy—will likely result in overcapacity, in our view. Already, there are reports of excessive data center buildouts, many of which involve assets with limited lifespans. Local governments have supported the development of facilities across the country, but this has led to overcapacity concerns in the Chinese data center market. According to Reuters, the state is now exploring the creation of a national, state-run cloud service to utilize the surplus computing resources.

In many ways, Alibaba’s trajectory reflects the story of China itself: a legacy powerhouse striving to reinvent itself amid economic headwinds and structural challenges. For investors, the key question remains whether this reinvention can generate lasting value—or if the current optimism surrounding the company’s AI ambitions will eventually give way to a sobering market correction.

1Hong, Iris. “China Home Price Decline Quickened in August, Strengthening Case for Fresh Stimulus.” Mingtiandi. 15 September 2025.

2“National Economy was Generally Stable with Steady Progress in August”. National Bureau of Statistics of China. 15 September 2025.

3Bloomberg News. “China’s Margin Trades Surge to a Record Amid Stock Rally”. Bloomberg. 2 September 2025.

4“Alibaba Group Announces June Quarter 2025 Results” Nasdaq. 29 August 2025.

5”Alibaba June Quarter 2025 Results”. Alibaba Group. June 2025.

6”Bloomberg News. “Jack Ma Returns with a Vengeance to “Make Alibaba Great Again””. Bloomberg. 15 September 2025.

7Feng, Coco. “China’s Top Market Regulator Summons Alibaba, Meituan, JD.com Over Delivery Price War”. SCMP. 19 July 2025.

8”Alibaba, Baidu begin using own chips to train AI models, The Information reports”. Reuters. 11 September 2025.

9wallstreetcn. ”Goldman Sachs: The narrative around China’s AI infrastructure has reignited”. MooMoo Technologies Inc. 16 September 2025.

10Fioretti, Julia. ”Alibaba Raise $1.5 Billion from Sale of Exchangeable Bonds”. Bloomberg. 3 July 2025.

11”Alibaba Group Announces Proposed Offering of Approximately HK$12 Billion of Zero Coupon Exchangeable Bonds”. Alibaba Group. 3 July 2025.

12”Alibaba’s Debt to Equity Ratio”. Macrotrends.com.

DEFINITIONS

Annual Recurring Revenue (ARR) is a financial metric used by subscription-based businesses to forecast and track predictable annual revenue, calculated by normalizing recurring contract value on an annual basis.

The debt-to-equity (D/E) ratio is a financial leverage metric that compares a company’s total liabilities to its shareholders’ equity, indicating the proportion of debt used to finance assets versus equity. A higher ratio suggests greater financial risk, as the company relies more on debt, while a lower ratio signals more financial stability and a conservative approach.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) is a measure of a company’s profitability, calculated by dividing quarterly or annual income (minus dividends) by the number of outstanding stock shares.

EBITA: Earnings Before Interest Taxes and Amortization.

Free cash flow (FCF) is the cash a company generates after covering its operating expenses and capital expenditures. It represents the discretionary cash a business can use to repay debt, pay dividends, fund buybacks, or invest in new growth opportunities.

The Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratio is a stock valuation metric that divides a company’s share price by its earnings per share (EPS), indicating what investors are willing to pay for each dollar of a company’s earnings. A higher P/E suggests investors expect higher future earnings, while a lower P/E may indicate a stock is undervalued or has lower growth potential.

GAAP: Generally Accepted Accounting Principles

Non-GAAP net income is a modified version of a company’s net income that removes certain one-time, non-recurring, or non-cash expenses or gains, as determined by the company’s management. Companies present non-GAAP net income to provide a potentially clearer view of their core operational performance by eliminating items that they believe distort the true, ongoing profitability of the business.

Operating cash flow (OCF) measures the actual cash a company generates from its core, day-to-day business activities, like selling products or services. It’s a more accurate indicator of financial health than net income because it’s less subject to manipulation and shows a company’s ability to fund operations, growth, and obligations.

IMPORTANT INFORMATION

This document may be distributed by GQG Partners LLC and its affiliates (collectively “GQG”).

The information provided in this document does not constitute investment advice and no investment decision should be made based on it. Neither the information contained in this document or in any accompanying oral presentation is a recommendation to follow any strategy or allocation. In addition, neither is it a recommendation, offer or solicitation to (i) sell or buy any security, (ii) purchase shares in any investment fund that GQG may sponsor, offer or manage, (iii) establish any separately managed account, or (iv) implement any investment advice. It should not be assumed that any investments made or recommended by GQG in the future will be profitable or will equal the performance of any securities discussed herein. Before making any investment decision, you should seek expert, professional advice, including tax advice, and obtain information regarding the legal, fiscal, regulatory and foreign currency requirements for any investment according to the law of your home country, place of residence or current abode.

This document reflects the views of GQG as of a particular time. GQG’s views may change without notice. Any forward-looking statements or forecasts are based on assumptions and actual results may vary.

GQG provides this information for informational purposes only. GQG has gathered the information in good faith from sources it believes to be reliable, including its own resources and third parties. However, GQG does not represent or warrant that any information, including, without limitation, any past performance results and any third-party information provided, is accurate, reliable or complete, and it should not be relied upon as such. GQG has not independently verified any information used or presented that is derived from third parties, which is subject to change. Information on holdings, allocations, and other characteristics is for illustrative purposes only and may not be representative of current or future investments or allocations.

Past performance may not be indicative of future results. Performance may vary substantially from year to year or even from month to month. The value of investments can go down as well as up. Future performance may be lower or higher than the performance presented and may include the possibility of loss of principal. It should not be assumed that investments made in the future will be profitable or will equal the performance of securities listed herein.

The information contained in this document is unaudited. It is published for the assistance of recipients but is not to be relied upon as authoritative and is not to be substituted for the exercise of one’s own judgment. GQG is not required to update the information contained in these materials, unless otherwise required by applicable law. No portion of this document and/or its attachments may be reproduced, quoted or distributed without the prior written consent of GQG.

GQG is registered as an investment adviser with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Please see GQG’s Form ADV Part 2, which is available upon request, for more information about GQG.

Any account or fund advised by GQG involves significant risks and is appropriate only for those persons who can bear the economic risk of the complete loss of their investment. There is no assurance that any account or fund will achieve its investment objectives. Accounts and funds are subject to price volatility and the value of a portfolio will change as the prices of investments go up or down. Before investing in a strategy, you should consider the risks of the strategy as well as whether the strategy is appropriate based upon your investment objectives and risk tolerance.

There may be additional risks associated with international and emerging markets investing involving foreign, economic, political, monetary, and/or legal factors. International investing is not for everyone. You can lose money by investing in securities.

GQG Partners LLC is a wholly owned subsidiary of GQG Partners Inc., a Delaware corporation that is listed on the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX: GQG). GQG Partners LLC and its affiliates provide certain services to each other.

INFORMATION ABOUT INDEXES

The MSCI China Index captures large and mid cap representation across China A shares, H shares, B shares, Red chips, P chips and foreign listings (e.g. ADRs). With 554 constituents, the index covers about 85% of this China equity universe. Currently, the index includes Large Cap A and Mid Cap A shares represented at 20% of their free float adjusted market capitalization.

You cannot invest directly in indices, which do not take into account trading commissions and costs.

NOTICE TO RECIPIENTS IN AUSTRALIA & NEW ZEALAND INVESTORS

The information in this document is issued and approved by GQG Partners LLC (“GQG”), a limited liability company and authorised representative of GQG Partners (Australia) Pty Ltd, ACN 626 132 572, AFSL number 515673. This information and our services may be provided to wholesale and retail clients (as defined in section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)) domiciled in Australia. This document contains general information only, does not contain any personal advice and does not take into account any prospective investor’s objectives, financial situation or needs. In New Zealand, any offer of a Fund is limited to ‘wholesale investors’ within the meaning of clause 3(2) of Schedule 1 of the Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013. This information is not intended to be distributed or passed on, directly or indirectly, to any other person.

NOTICE TO RECIPIENTS IN CANADA (Alberta, British Columbia, Manitoba, New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, Ontario, Québec, Saskatchewan (the “Canadian Jurisdictions”))

GQG Partners LLC relies on the (i) international adviser exemption pursuant to section 8.26 of NI 31-103 in each of the Canadian Jurisdictions, and (ii) non-resident investment fund manager exemption pursuant to section 4 of MI 32-102 in Ontario and Québec and is not registered as an adviser or investment fund manager in the Canadian Jurisdictions.

This document has been prepared solely for information purposes and is not an offering memorandum or any other kind of an offer to buy or sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell any security, instrument or investment product or to participate in any particular trading strategy.  It is not intended and should not be taken as any form of advertising, recommendation, investment advice or invitation to trade.  This information is confidential and for the use of the intended recipient only. The distribution of this document in Canada is restricted to recipients who are qualified “permitted clients” for purposes of National Instrument 31-103 Registration Requirements, Exemptions and Ongoing Registrant Obligations. This document may not be reproduced, redistributed or copied in whole or in part for any purpose without the prior written consent of GQG. Upon receipt of this document, each Canadian recipient hereby confirms having expressly requested that all documents evidencing or relating in any way to the information described herein be drawn up in the English language only. Par la réception de ce document, le détenteur au Canada de celui-ci confirme par les présentes avoir expressément exigé que tous les documents faisant foi ou se rapportant de quelque manière que ce soit aux informations présentées dans ce document soient rédigés en anglais seulement.

NOTICE TO RECIPIENTS IN SOUTH AFRICA

GQG PARTNERS LLC is an authorised financial services provider in the Republic of South Africa and regulated by the Financial Sector Conduct Authority (FSCA) with FSP number: 48881. Investors should take cognisance of the fact that there are always risks involved when buying or selling any financial product. Past performance of a financial product is not necessarily indicative of future performance. The value of financial products can increase as well as decrease over time, depending on the value of the underlying securities and prevailing market conditions. The investment value of a financial product is not guaranteed, and any illustrations, forecasts or hypothetical data are provided for illustrative purposes only. This document does not constitute financial advice, a solicitation, invitation or investment recommendation. Prior to selecting a financial product or investment, it is recommended that South African based investors seek and obtain specialised financial, legal and tax advice.

NOTICE TO RECIPIENTS IN THE UNITED KINGDOM

GQG Partners LLC is not an authorised person for the purposes of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 of the United Kingdom (“FSMA”) and the distribution of this document in the United Kingdom is restricted by law. Accordingly, this document is provided only for and is directed only at persons in the United Kingdom reasonably believed to be of a kind to whom such promotions may be communicated by a person who is not an authorised person under FSMA pursuant to the FSMA (Financial Promotion) Order 2005 (the “FPO”). Such persons include: (a) persons having professional experience in matters relating to investments; and (b) high net worth bodies corporate, partnerships, unincorporated associations, trusts, etc. falling within Article 49 of the FPO. The services provided by GQG Partners LLC and the investment opportunities described in this document are available only to such persons, and persons of any other description may not rely on the information in it. All, or most, of the rules made under the FSMA for the protection of retail clients will not apply, and compensation under the United Kingdom Financial Services Compensation Scheme will not be available.

GQG Partners (UK) Ltd. is a company registered in England and Wales, registered number 1175684. GQG Partners (UK) Ltd. is an appointed representative of Sapia Partners LLP, which is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (“FCA”) (550103).

NOTICE TO RECIPIENTS IN ADGM

GQG Partners Ltd, a company limited by shares, registered in Abu Dhabi Global Markets (“ADGM”), having its address at Unit 12, 7th Floor, Al Khatem Tower, Al Maryah Island, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. GQG Partners Ltd is licensed by the ADGM’s Financial Services Regulatory Authority (FSRA) (license number 240015). GQG Partners Limited is licensed by the ADGM’s Financial Services Regulatory Authority (FSRA) to conduct the regulated activities of Managing a Collective Investment Fund, Advising on Investments or Credit, Arranging Deals in Investments, Managing Assets, Shari’a-compliant Regulated Activities. This document is intended for distribution only to persons of a type specified in the FSRA’s Rules (i.e., “Professional Clients”) and must not be delivered to or relied on by any other type of person. It is for the exclusive use of the persons to whom it is addressed and in connection with the subject matter contained therein. The FSRA, or any other regulatory authority, has no responsibility for reviewing or verifying this document or any other document in connection with it. Accordingly, the FSRA, or any other regulatory authority, neither approved this document or any other associated documents nor taken any steps to verify the information set out in this document and has no responsibility for it.

© 2025 GQG Partners LLC. All rights reserved. This document reflects the views of GQG as of September 2025.

TL RLTYCHK 0925