Key Takeaways
By focusing on sound fundamentals we aim to guard against long-term downside risks and avoid speculative bubbles
In the current environment, we view defensive sectors such as utilities, staples, and insurance as offering attractive total return potential due to their valuations, stable growth, and capital return
Being early in identifying bubbles reflects our disciplined approach to seeking durable, quality businesses, in our view
As our long-time followers likely know, GQG’s best performance historically has generally come in bear markets and our worst performance has come in frothy markets. The good news for long-term investors is that over full market cycles, the math of having downside risk management with less participation on the upside has led to meaningful outperformance on the whole.
For better or for worse, this latest cycle has been no different. Our decision to cut back risk, particularly in the artificial intelligence theme, cost us significant relative performance in 2025. We think these painful periods are much easier to explain and understand after a full cycle. For now, let us reflect on our journey thus far, focusing on the areas that excite us today, and our course forward from here.
As we revisit our decision to stay out of the AI frenzy trade mania in 2025, we think it is helpful to break down our reflection discussion into two parts: direction and timing.
Direction: No doubts about the bubble
On direction, we remain confident that we are on the right track based on the work our team continues to do. We have written extensively about it in the past few months. In fact, we revisited our AI thesis numerous times throughout the year and continue to do so to make sure we are not being dogmatic in our portfolio positioning—including deploying our non-traditional analysts in the field. We believe each of the incremental data points we have found makes it nearly impossible to embark on the hype and underwrite the level of spending and valuations that we think are simply unsustainable.
Although we have been penalized in relative performance for not joining the AI party, we still think this is the most prudent path. We remember high-flying firms that performed well heading into the peak of the dotcom bubble, only to fare extremely poorly once the bubble burst. Many firms that did well during the housing bubble met similar fates due to unbridled enthusiasm.
In our view, this is a narrative-driven market where basic fundamentals are being ignored and replaced with buzz words that are normalizing valuations completely uncorrelated with earnings—take SpaceX’s $800 billion valuation against its $15 billion revenue (while also likely being barely profitable).1 In normal markets, such math does not stand up, particularly for companies that face increasing competition! In bubbles, the narrative can pave the way for others to stretch reality.
And while we are on the topic of space, it has been shocking to hear that some investors are actually buying into the narrative of building data centers in space to handle demand for the AI boom once we run into constraints on earth.
Timing: There is no such thing as too early
In terms of the timing, a question we often get is: What if we are early? With the benefit of hindsight, one may claim we were early. But the reality is it is impossible to time when a bubble bursts, so you are either early or you are late and the cost of being late can often be fatal. Anyone who has followed the investment industry for any time will remember many asset managers who disappeared post the dotcom bubble and the GFC era for being late.
Over a full cycle, we still think being early does not mean being wrong—despite the cliché saying—and especially at the kind of extreme valuations we are seeing today. In fact, given the other side of this bubble, we are thrilled to own the unloved at the valuations offered in the market today (more on that below). I have heard more than a few investors cite George Soros’s famous quote: “When I see a bubble forming, I rush in to buy.” What they may not realize is that even Soros’s fund was hit hard for chasing tech stocks in the final innings of the 2000 bubble, causing his legendary protégé Stanley Druckenmiller to resign shortly after.2 In my experience, market tops are only obvious in hindsight. No one rings a bell telling you precisely when to exit.
If anything, management teams are typically extremely bullish at the peak as earnings are booming. For example, some of the leading semiconductor CEOs were wildly bullish in late 2021, just before the semiconductor sector entered its worst bear market in over a decade. I vividly remember attending standing-room-only meetings for steel and coal companies in 2007 and for semiconductors in 1999! Micron Technology crossed the peak of its 2000 share price conclusively only in 2025.3 That is rather long for even the most long-term shareholder. Recall that 2000 was also the year we were “running out of memory” due to fires in some Japanese foundries. That was followed by a glut of memory in the market that lasted for about a decade.
Given how quickly markets have historically tended to panic, I have learned time and time again that it is far better to be too early than even slightly late. The markets gave a sneak preview of this phenomenon earlier last year when DeepSeek was announced and tech stocks collapsed. This happened during the last tech bubble as well. For example, Microsoft lost over a third of its value in just a week in 2000.4
However, we understand the FOMO in the markets. In bubbles, markets seem to find ways to deny reality until the facts become unavoidable. We cannot control that. But we also cannot break our fiduciary duty with our clients and invest in hype when the math does not make sense to us.
What we like in 2026: Solid, dependable returns
Instead, we would rather look for companies and areas where we see what we consider to be dependable opportunities, where earnings are coming through consistently and valuations make sense. At GQG, we are truly excited for the portfolio we have been able to build!
Generally speaking, we think we are finding the best risk-reward opportunities in historically defensive sectors such as staples, utilities, healthcare, and insurance, to name a few. Note this is not a macro call at all. This is simply a result of the market’s extreme disinterest in more boring, defensive assets. As a result, we believe long-term investors can find great opportunities to own quality, steady-eddy compounders such as defensive stocks which are virtually at all-time lows in relative P/E and benchmark weight. Plus, we think their longer-term outlooks are improving after years of transition.
Regardless of the AI bubble, we believe these are high quality, durable businesses with attractive valuations, which can pave the way for potentially very attractive absolute and relative returns going forward, especially if markets sell off.
The weighted average earnings per share (EPS) growth for most of our strategies is almost high-single digits plus a ~3% to 4% dividend yield, which we believe is a very attractive return profile, particularly when multiples are on average around mid-teens or lower.
Defensives Relative Forward P/E Ratio
S&P 500 Defensive Sectors Weight
Utilities
Let us start with utilities. We believe US utilities should grow earnings faster, more predictably, and with more long-term visibility than at any time in the past twenty-plus years, while trading at a material discount to the S&P 500 today.
The sector has gone through a transformation toward a more regulated environment. With or without the AI boom, we think the utilities we are excited about should benefit from a structural increase in power demand. Note that we were careful in our due diligence, as not all utilities are created equal. We stayed away from utility investments that were predicated on the AI boom for base load growth. We also engaged with our utility holdings to urge them not to embark on the hype.
In fact, one of the utilities we quite like is actually not even in the power space. Take American Water Works, as an example. We view this as an extremely stable water utility that has consistently delivered ~8% earnings growth, regardless of the economic environment. Until recently, the stock generally traded at a premium to the S&P 500 index given faster growth (S&P 500’s long-term EPS growth of ~7%) and significantly less volatility (0.2x beta). However, it now trades at a discount (21x vs. S&P 500’s 22x) yet we think it can deliver low double-digit total return (high single-digit EPS growth plus a 3% dividend yield) with lower risk versus the S&P 500. It represents a great risk-reward relative to most other options in the market, in our opinion.
Compare the attractive and stable returns we think we can find in various utilities with JP Morgan, for example. We believe it is one of the best banks in the US with a fantastic CEO. However, loan growth has been mediocre, as highlighted in the bank’s latest results. Their return on equity was lower in 2025 versus 2024 and so was their net income, with reported low single-digit revenue growth—the stock’s valuation is at its highest if you look back over a 25-year period. When JP Morgan is selling at 15x with mid single-digit growth and a cloudy outlook given economic uncertainties, we grow wary. And with talk of the administration potentially putting a cap on credit card interest rates, we do not think this and other US banks are the best investment opportunity at this time. We would rather buy companies that we believe offer far more certainty for similar valuations.
Staples
Another area where we currently see great potential is in the consumer staples sector. We are finding names trading at significant discounts to the S&P 500, which we think was previously unimaginable. Keep in mind, these are much better than average businesses with similar ~7% long-term earnings growth and higher stability!
In our view, many of the companies in the sector went through a lost decade but are poised to enter a new capital and product cycle on their way to a turnaround.
Take Philip Morris, as an example. It is the world’s biggest tobacco company, and having reinvented itself, has been growing rapidly due to its popular next-generation products. The stock trades at 19x EPS, a meaningful discount to the S&P 500, and we think the company can achieve a mid-teens total return (low double-digit EPS growth plus a 4% dividend yield). In fact, we believe Philip Morris may deliver faster earnings growth than most of the Magnificent 7 over the next five years. Why even bother guessing who will win the AI wars when you can get better growth from a boring tobacco company?
Another example is Heineken, which is selling at 13x times earnings, and in our view, has the potential to grow earnings at mid- to high-single digits over the long run. Heineken has an expansive emerging markets footprint as beer consumption continues to grow globally—with or without GLP-1s.5 The company has gone through a significant derating after taking prices up aggressively during COVID. That digestion period is coming to an end, in our view, and does not represent any structural issues with the business. It is also a family-owned business, of great operators and stewards of capital in our opinion.
Insurance
We are finding similar opportunities in the insurance space. The insurance companies we own in certain strategies have been high-quality compounders, in our view, among them Chubb, Progressive, and Allstate. They all have demonstrated strong underwriting and consequently, all three companies have outperformed the S&P 500 over the last five years. Chubb, for example, has had a combined ratio over the last 20 years that is 700 basis points better than the industry average.
Conclusion
To summarize, we believe that for the first time in years, we are finding plenty of opportunities to own companies with the potential to achieve double-digit compounding in fairly mundane sectors now that this excessive optimism for AI stocks has shifted the market’s perspective so much. We believe that when this trend reverses to what others view as boring, our early calls will likely be viewed as well-timed.
As always, thank you for your support.
Rajiv Jain
Chairman & Chief Investment Officer
GQG Partners LLC
END NOTES
1Jin, Berber, et al. “SpaceX in Talks for $800 Billion Valuation Ahead of Potential 2026 IPO“. The Wall Street Journal. 5 December 2025.
2Norris, Floyd. “Another Technology Victim; Top Soros Fund Manager Says He ‘Overplayed’ Hand”. The New York Times. 29 April 2000.
3GQG Research.
4GQG Research.
5Heineken Investor Presentation. May 2025.
DEFINITIONS
Earnings Per Share (EPS) is a measure of a company’s profitability, calculated by dividing quarterly or annual income (minus dividends) by the number of outstanding stock shares.
GFC: Global Financial Crisis of 2008.
P/E (Price-to-Earnings) ratio is a stock valuation metric that shows how much investors are willing to pay for $1 of a company’s earnings, calculated by dividing the stock’s current price by its earnings per share (EPS). A high P/E can signal high growth expectations or an overvalued stock, while a low P/E might suggest undervaluation or low future growth prospects.
Beta: Relative volatility measured as systematic risk relative to a benchmark.
Combined ratio: An insurance metric measuring profitability by comparing total costs (incurred losses + expenses) to total earned premiums.
IMPORTANT INFORMATION
This webpage may be distributed by GQG Partners LLC and its affiliates (collectively “GQG”).
The information provided on this website does not constitute investment advice and no investment decision should be made based on it. Neither the information contained in this document or in any accompanying oral presentation is a recommendation to follow any strategy or allocation. In addition, neither is it a recommendation, offer or solicitation to (i) sell or buy any security, (ii) purchase shares in any investment fund that GQG may sponsor, offer or manage, (iii) establish any separately managed account, or (iv) implement any investment advice. It should not be assumed that any investments made or recommended by GQG in the future will be profitable or will equal the performance of any securities discussed herein. Before making any investment decision, you should seek expert, professional advice, including tax advice, and obtain information regarding the legal, fiscal, regulatory and foreign currency requirements for any investment according to the law of your home country, place of residence or current abode.
This webpage reflects the views of GQG as at a particular time. GQG’s views may change without notice. Any forward-looking statements or forecasts are based on assumptions and actual results may vary.
GQG provides this information for informational purposes only. GQG has gathered the information in good faith from sources it believes to be reliable, including its own resources and third parties. However, GQG does not represent or warrant that any information, including, without limitation, any past performance results and any third-party information provided, is accurate, reliable, or complete, and it should not be relied upon as such. GQG has not independently verified any information used or presented that is derived from third parties, which is subject to change. Information on holdings, allocations, and other characteristics is for illustrative purposes only and may not be representative of current or future investments or allocations.
The information contained on this website is unaudited. It is published for the assistance of recipients but is not to be relied upon as authoritative and is not to be substituted for the exercise of one’s own judgment. GQG is not required to update the information contained in these materials, unless otherwise required by applicable law. No portion of this document and/or its attachments may be reproduced, quoted or distributed without the prior written consent of GQG.
Past performance may not be indicative of future results. Performance may vary substantially from year to year or even from month to month. The value of investments can go down as well as up. Future performance may be lower or higher than the performance presented and may include the possibility of loss of principal. It should not be assumed that investments made in the future will be profitable or will equal the performance of securities listed herein.
Any account or fund advised by GQG involves significant risks and is appropriate only for those persons who can bear the economic risk of the complete loss of their investment. There is no assurance that any account or fund will achieve its investment objectives. Accounts and funds are subject to price volatility and the value of a portfolio will change as the prices of investments go up or down. Before investing in a strategy, you should consider the risks of the strategy as well as whether the strategy is appropriate based upon your investment objectives and risk tolerance.
There may be additional risks associated with international and emerging markets investing involving foreign, economic, political, monetary, and/or legal factors. International investing is not for everyone. You can lose money by investing in securities.
GQG Partners LLC is a wholly owned subsidiary of GQG Partners Inc., a Delaware corporation that is listed on the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX: GQG). GQG Partners LLC and its affiliates provide certain services to each other.
GQG Partners LLC is registered as an investment adviser with the US Securities and Exchange Commission. Please see its Form ADV Part 2, which is available upon request, for more information.
INFORMATION ON BENCHMARKS
The MSCI All Country World Index (MSCI ACWI) captures large and mid cap representation across 23 Developed Markets (DM) and 24 Emerging Markets (EM) countries.
The MSCI All Country World ex USA Index (MSCI ACWI ex USA) captures large and mid cap representation across 22 of 23 Developed Markets (DM) countries (excluding the US) and 24 Emerging Markets (EM) countries.
The MSCI Emerging Markets Index captures large and mid cap representation across 24 Emerging Markets (EM) countries.
The S&P 500® Index is a widely used stock market index that can serve as a barometer of US stock market performance, particularly with respect to larger capitalization stocks. It is a market-weighted index of stocks of 500 leading companies in leading industries and represents a significant portion of the market value of all stocks publicly traded in the United States.
You cannot invest directly in indices, which do not take into account trading commissions and costs.
NOTICE TO RECIPIENTS IN AUSTRALIA & NEW ZEALAND
The information in this document is issued and approved by GQG Partners LLC (“GQG”), a limited liability company and authorised representative of GQG Partners (Australia) Pty Ltd, ACN 626 132 572, AFSL number 515673. This information and our services may be provided to wholesale and retail clients (as defined in section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)) domiciled in Australia. This document contains general information only, does not contain any personal advice and does not take into account any prospective investor’s objectives, financial situation or needs. In New Zealand, any offer of a Fund is limited to ‘wholesale investors’ within the meaning of clause 3(2) of Schedule 1 of the Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013. This information is not intended to be distributed or passed on, directly or indirectly, to any other person.
NOTICE TO RECIPIENTS IN CANADA: Alberta, British Columbia, Manitoba, New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, Ontario, Québec, Saskatchewan (the “Canadian Jurisdictions” Only)
GQG Partners LLC relies on the (i) international adviser exemption pursuant to section 8.26 of NI 31-103 in each of the Canadian Jurisdictions, and (ii) non-resident investment fund manager exemption pursuant to section 4 of MI 32-102 in Ontario and Québec and is not registered as an adviser or investment fund manager in the Canadian Jurisdictions. This document has been prepared solely for information purposes and is not an offering memorandum or any other kind of an offer to buy or sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell any security, instrument or investment product or to participate in any particular trading strategy. It is not intended and should not be taken as any form of advertising, recommendation, investment advice or invitation to trade. This information is confidential and for the use of the intended recipient only. The distribution of this document in Canada is restricted to recipients who are qualified “permitted clients” for purposes of National Instrument 31-103 Registration Requirements, Exemptions and Ongoing Registrant Obligations. This document may not be reproduced, redistributed or copied in whole or in part for any purpose without the prior written consent of GQG.
NOTICE TO RECIPIENTS IN SOUTH AFRICA
GQG PARTNERS LLC is an authorised financial services providerin the Republic of South Africa and regulated by the Financial Sector Conduct Authority (FSCA) with FSP number: 48881. Investors should take cognisance of the fact that there arealways risks involved when buying or selling any financial product. Past performance of a financial product is not necessarily indicative of future performance. The value of financial products can increase as well as decrease over time, depending on the value of the underlying securities and prevailing market conditions. The investment value of a financial product is not guaranteed, and any illustrations, forecasts or hypothetical data are provided for illustrative purposes only. This document does not constitute financial advice, a solicitation, invitation or investment recommendation. Prior to selecting a financial product or investment, it is recommended that South African based investors seek and obtain specialised financial, legal and tax advice.
NOTICE TO RECIPIENTS IN THE UNITED KINGDOM
GQG Partners LLC is not an authorised person for the purposes of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 of the United Kingdom (“FSMA”) and the distribution of this document in the United Kingdom is restricted by law. Accordingly, this document is provided only for and is directed only at persons in the United Kingdom reasonably believed to be of a kind to whom such promotions may be communicated by a person who is not an authorised person under FSMA pursuant to the FSMA (Financial Promotion) Order 2005 (the “FPO”). Such persons include: (a) persons having professional experience in matters relating to investments; and (b) high net worth bodies corporate, partnerships, unincorporated associations, trusts, etc. falling within Article 49 of the FPO. The services provided by GQG Partners LLC and the investment opportunities described in this document are available only to such persons, and persons of any other description may not rely on the information in it. All, or most, of the rules made under the FSMA for the protection of retail clients will not apply, and compensation under the United Kingdom Financial Services Compensation Scheme will not be available.
GQG Partners (UK) Ltd. is a company registered in England and Wales, registered number 1175684. GQG Partners (UK) Ltd. is an appointed representative of Sapia Partners LLP, which is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (“FCA”) (550103).
NOTICE TO RECIPIENTS IN ADGM
GQG Partners Ltd, a company limited by shares, registered in Abu Dhabi Global Markets (“ADGM”), having its address at Unit 12, 7th Floor, Al Khatem Tower, Al Maryah Island, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. GQG Partners Ltd is licensed by the ADGM’s Financial Services Regulatory Authority (FSRA) (license number 240015). GQG Partners Limited is licensed by the ADGM’s Financial Services Regulatory Authority (FSRA) to conduct the regulated activities of Managing a Collective Investment Fund, Advising on Investments or Credit, Arranging Deals in Investments, Managing Assets, Shari’a-compliant Regulated Activities. This document is intended for distribution only to persons of a type specified in the FSRA’s Rules (i.e., “Professional Clients”) and must not be delivered to or relied on by any other type of person. It is for the exclusive use of the persons to whom it is addressed and in connection with the subject matter contained therein. The FSRA, or any other regulatory authority, has no responsibility for reviewing or verifying this document or any other document in connection with it. Accordingly, the FSRA, or any other regulatory authority, neither approved this document or any other associated documents nor taken any steps to verify the information set out in this document and has no responsibility for it.
© 2026 GQG Partners LLC. All rights reserved. Data presented as at 30 December 2025 and denominated in US dollars (US$) unless otherwise indicated.
CIOPR 4Q25–RTL