Is Modi India’s Most Effective Post-Independence Leader?

Key Takeaways

  • After decades of socialism and economic stagnation, India underwent a series of reforms in the early 1990s, such as privatizing state-owned companies and encouraging private sector investment, which led to an economic boom

  • Following the global financial crisis, India’s reform agenda stalled and corruption scandals emerged, leading to economic stagnation and India being labeled as one of the Fragile Five emerging market economies

  • Since 2014, under Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s leadership, India has witnessed ongoing economic reforms, aimed at reducing corruption, decreasing the government’s role in the economy, fostering private sector investment, and investing heavily in infrastructure, transforming India into a more pro-business environment

Period One: the Partial Liberalization the Indian Economy In The Early 1990s

The decades of socialism since Independence had led to a dormant economy, with a vast majority of the population in poverty. Many still remember monopolies being handed to a few cronies, resulting in long waiting lines for almost everything, from buying a two-wheeler to securing a telephone connection.

During this period, entire sectors were nationalized (such as the banking system in the early 1970s), tax rates exceeded 90 per cent for the highest earners, and corruption ran rampant. The corporate tax rate was close to 57 per cent and customs duties of 200-300 per cent were common. These economic policies stifled the country’s growth for decades; critics cruelly dubbed it the “Hindu rate of growth”. It is hard to believe now, but GDP per capita only grew at 1.3 per cent per annum over those four decades.

Eventually, India faced a major economic crisis in 1991, where the government nearly defaulted and ran out of foreign exchange reserves. This forced the hand of then Prime Minister Narasimha Rao to institute much needed reforms. Rao’s Congress administration does not get enough credit, but he was ironically the best Prime Minister the Congress party produced in its long history. The rest of them, while being adept politicians have turned out to be rather mediocre economic stewards of India.

While painful at the time, the 1991 crisis proved to be a blessing in disguise as it forced the country to adopt pro- market measures and end the License Raj. State-owned companies were privatized, the currency peg was eventually removed, private sector investment was encouraged, and the fiscal situation was stabilized. In other words, India was finally beginning to cut back on socialistic policies, resulting in an economic boom. In 2001, Goldman Sachs even named India as part of the BRIC countries expected to dominate the global economy. However, the good times did not last.

Central banks are dominating the headlines, which is not surprising given the increase in interest rates from zero, or below, during the last 15 months. ”

PERIOD TWO: THE STAGNATION POST-GFC (GLOBAL FINANCIAL CRISIS)

Politicians seemingly forgot what had triggered the boom years – a combination of reforms and the global boom led by China. The reform agenda stalled, and in certain cases, even reversed. The incumbent party was embroiled in countless corruption scandals, including the infamous telecom scandal, where the government was accused of giving away cheap spectrum licenses in exchange for bribes. As a result, in 2013, Morgan Stanley labeled India as one of the Fragile Five emerging market economies. The August 2013 cover of The Economist captures the entire picture of what Modi inherited from the prior administration.

Before we proceed, we want to make it clear that this is not a political statement or endorsement. Rather, this is an attempt to objectively analyze and highlight key structural and economic policy improvements taking place in India, putting aside the political noise or controversies one may point to regarding Modi and his party. As global investors who have followed India closely, our focus at GQG Partners is to shed light on what we consider to be a major transformation that has been occurring in India and getting lost in the headlines.

PERIOD THREE: THE ONGOING REFORMS (2014-PRESENT)

Frustrated with the lack of progress, Indian voters decisively removed the incumbent party from power in the 2014 elections. Narendra Modi, the then-chief minister of Gujarat state, won the election with the promise of economic reforms. Under his leadership, Gujarat had heavily invested in infrastructure, cut red tape, and emerged as one of the most pro-business and prosperous states in India. As prime minister, he promised to replicate the “Gujarat model of development” across the country. However, he was dealt a bad hand and spent the first few years stabilizing the economy. By the time he came into office, the rupee had collapsed from 45 USD/INR in 2010 to 65 USD/INR in 2014, and the banking system was on the verge of a major crisis. A decade later, Modi has the highest approval ratings in the world by far, largely due to his economic policies.

Before we proceed, we want to make it clear that this is not a political statement or endorsement. Rather, this is an attempt to objectively analyze and highlight key structural and economic policy improvements taking place in India, putting aside the political noise or controversies one may point to regarding Modi and his party. As global investors who have followed India closely, our focus at GQG Partners is to shed light on what we consider to be a major transformation that has been occurring in India and getting lost in the headlines.

POTENTIAL IMPACT OF ECONOMIC REFORM NOT YET FULLY RECOGNIZED

While Indian voters have already recognized it, we believe that the financial markets and mainstream media have not fully grasped the long-term implications of Modi’s economic reform agenda. Given India’s sheer size (with one in every six people globally residing in India), reforms in the country will have implications for the world economy, akin to the early-2000s China boom. Despite being the fifth-largest stock market in the world at $3.5 trillion (for comparison, Germany is $2 trillion and Japan is $5 trillion), India represents less than 2 per cent of the MSCI ACWI Index and less than 15 per cent of the MSCI Emerging Markets Index, partly due to quirks in the index construction that we believe are not always logical.

We have also been surprised to witness such negative media coverage on India despite the remarkable progress. Jefferies’ strategist Chris Wood attributed this lopsided coverage to the fact that most “Indian correspondents talk only to the traditionally champagne-socialist intelligentsia so visible on English language Indian TV channels…[who] have found themselves removed from all forms of influence in Delhi since Modi took power in 2014…[and] are willing to air their frustrations to anybody prepared to listen.”1 This lack of financial and media interest in India creates an attractive entry point for long-term investors in our opinion.

So Why Are Bullish on India?

As global investors, we monitor economic policies in every major country and deploy our capital accordingly. We have been increasingly disappointed with the recent policies implemented in the developed world, such as endless stimulus in both the US and Europe, regulatory crackdowns in China, and even nationalization in France. In contrast, we believe India stands out with its move to become more pro-business.

Modi’s economic framework can be boiled down to these key pillars:

Reducing Corruption and Crony Capitalism

A landmark reform was the 2016 Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, which created a framework to deal with insolvent companies. A joke among veteran Indian bankers was that corporate borrowers would travel in coach while initially securing loans, and then travel in private jets while arrogantly renegotiating loans. Those days are over; managements that renege on loans now end up forfeiting their assets and getting arrested. Similarly, the 2016 Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act has transformed the real estate sector and ensured that fraudulent real estate developers are punished and weeded out.

Reducing Government’s Role In The Economy

To quote Modi himself, “the government has no business to be in business.”2 We couldn’t agree more. Based on our experience investing in other emerging markets, a bloated government tends to crowd out the more efficient private sector and hurts productivity growth. For example, the Indian government recently announced the National Monetization Pipeline where it will monetize its key state-owned assets and use the proceeds to fund infrastructure development.
A good case study is Air India’s privatization.3 Air India (the second-largest Indian airline operator) was a chronically loss-making state-owned company. It cost the taxpayer approximately $1 billion annually just to keep it afloat until the government sold it to the Tata Group in 2022. Just a year later, the Tata Group placed the biggest aircraft order in India’s aviation history. This demonstrates the power of privatization: the government receives cash to deploy elsewhere, and consumers benefit from increased investment in the sector. In contrast, China is going in the opposite direction.

Fostering Private Sector Investment

Every Indian corporate we speak to mentions how much the current administration has streamlined day-to-day business, whether it is acquiring land, obtaining business permits, or bidding for projects. For example, this administration simplified India’s complicated tax policy with its landmark GST Tax Reform in 2017. This bill reduced the tax burden for businesses while still increasing government tax collections. The bill also allowed the government to eventually reduce the corporate tax rate from 30 per cent to 22 per cent in 2019.
Additionally, the government has made impressive progress on the digital front. For example, its Unified Payments Interface was launched in 2016 to facilitate digital transactions, bringing millions of Indians and small businesses into the formal economy. By some standards, India has leapfrogged many developed countries with its payments infrastructure. Similarly, India’s private sector has innovatively increased broadband access increasing 12 times in the past ten years to nearly 900 million connections. Indian consumers now enjoy first world broadband at developing world prices.

INVESTING HEAVILY IN INFRASTRUCTURE

Infrastructure investments have a powerful multiplier effect on the economy as they facilitate trade, improve mobility, create employment opportunities, and boost overall economic productivity. The Modi administration has made infrastructure a key component of its economic agenda. For example, the government recently increased its capital investment outlay by almost 30 per cent year over year in its latest budget. Railways alone have been allocated approximately nine times as much money as compared to just a decade ago.

While this is not perfect, we believe the country’s infrastructure is heading in the right direction.

In many ways, India’s infrastructure push under Modi reminds us of China’s boom in the early-2000s. Historically, India’s manufacturing sector faced a significant disadvantage versus global peers due to sub-par domestic logistics. But that is now finally changing. For example, the two freight corridors connecting New Delhi to Mumbai and Punjab to West Bengal will increase the average speed from 25kph to 70kph and allow double stacking.

Similarly, under Modi’s administration, the country has doubled both its rural road network and number of airports. Approvals, as well as project execution, have improved by an order of magnitude. As an example, India’s new parliament building went from initial design phase to final completion phase in just over three years despite facing COVID challenges in between. Similarly, Mumbai’s Trans Harbor Link is a 14-mile sea bridge connecting the island to the mainland and is nearing completion just 5 years after beginning construction. Few countries could deliver these projects so efficiently, outside of China. This is very unlike the India of 15 years ago!

INDIA’S ECONOMIC PROSPECTS ARE PROMISING

Eventually, India faced a major economic crisis in 1991, where the government nearly defaulted and ran out of foreign exchange reserves. This forced the hand of then Prime Minister Narasimha Rao to institute much needed reforms. Rao’s Congress administration does not get enough credit, but he was ironically the best Prime Minister the Congress party produced in its long history. The rest of them, while being adept politicians have turned out to be rather mediocre economic stewards of India.

END NOTES

1Wood, Christopher. “Modi and the champagne socialists”. Jeffries Group, Greed and Fear. May 25, 2023.

2Government Has “No Business To Be In Business”: PM Narendra Modi”. NDTV News Desk. February 24, 2021. 
https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/government-has-no-business-to-be-in-business-pm-narendra-modi-2377787

3Agarwal, Anil. “Privatized Air India’s takeoff can lead other PSUs to thrive as well.” Mint. March 22, 2023. 
https://www.livemint.com/opinion/columns/privatized-air-india-s-takeoff-can-lead-other-psus-to-thrive-as-well-11679507831150.html

IMPORTANT INFORMATION

The information provided in this document does not constitute investment advice and no investment decision should be made based on it. Neither the information contained in this document or in any accompanying oral presentation is a recommendation to follow any strategy or allocation. In addition, neither is a recommendation, offer or solicitation to sell or buy any security or to purchase of shares in any fund or establish any separately managed account. It should not be assumed that any investments made by GQG Partners LLC (GQG) in the future will be profitable or will equal the performance of any securities discussed herein. Before making any investment decision, you should seek expert, professional advice, including tax advice, and obtain information regarding the legal, fiscal, regulatory and foreign currency requirements for any investment according to the law of your home country, place of residence or current abode.

This document reflects the views of GQG as of a particular time. GQG’s views may change without notice. Any forward-looking statements or forecasts are based on assumptions and actual results may vary. GQG provides this information for informational purposes only. GQG has gathered the information in good faith from sources it believes to be reliable, including its own resources and third parties. However, GQG does not represent or warrant that any information, including, without limitation, any past performance results and any third-party information provided, is accurate, reliable or complete, and it should not be relied upon as such. GQG has not independently verified any information used or presented that is derived from third parties, which is subject to change. Information on holdings, allocations, and other characteristics is for illustrative purposes only and may not be representative of current or future investments or allocations.
Past performance may not be indicative of future results. Performance may vary substantially from year to year or even from month to month. The value of investments can go down as well as up. Future performance may be lower or higher than the performance presented and may include the possibility of loss of principal. It should not be assumed that investments made in the future will be profitable or will equal the performance of securities listed herein.
The information contained in this document is unaudited. It is published for the assistance of recipients, but is not to be relied upon as authoritative and is not to be substituted for the exercise of one’s own judgment. GQG is not required to update the information contained in these materials, unless otherwise required by applicable law. No portion of this document and/or its attachments may be reproduced, quoted or distributed without the prior written consent of GQG.
GQG is registered as an investment adviser with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Please see GQG’s Form ADV Part 2, which is available upon request, for more information about GQG.

Any account or fund advised by GQG involves significant risks and is appropriate only for those persons who can bear the economic risk of the complete loss of their investment. There is no assurance that any account or fund will achieve its investment objectives. Accounts and funds are subject to price volatility and the value of a portfolio will change as the prices of investments go up or down. Before investing in a strategy, you should consider the risks of the strategy as well as whether the strategy is appropriate based upon your investment objectives and risk tolerance.

There may be additional risks associated with international and emerging markets investing involving foreign, economic, political, monetary, and/or legal factors. International investing is not for everyone. You can lose money by investing in securities.

Where referenced, the title Partner for an employee of GQG Partners LLC indicates the individual’s leadership status within the organization. While Partners hold equity interests in GQG Partners Inc., as a legal matter they do not hold partnership interests in GQG Partners LLC or GQG Partners Inc.
GQG Partners LLC is a wholly owned subsidiary of GQG Partners Inc., a Delaware corporation that is listed on the Australian Securities Exchange.

NOTICE TO AUSTRALIA & NEW ZEALAND INVESTORS

The information in this document is issued and approved by GQG Partners LLC (“GQG”), a limited liability company and authorised representative of GQG Partners (Australia) Pty Ltd, ACN 626 132 572, AFSL number 515673. This information and our services may only be provided to retail and wholesale clients (as defined in section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)) domiciled in Australia. This document contains general information only, does not contain any personal advice and does not take into account any prospective investor’s objectives, financial situation or needs. In New Zealand, any offer of a Fund is limited to ‘wholesale investors’ within the meaning of clause 3(2) of Schedule 1 of the Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013. This information is not intended to be dis-tributed or passed on, directly or indirectly, to any other class of persons in Australia and New Zealand, or to persons outside of Australia and New Zealand.

NOTICE TO CANADIAN INVESTORS

This document has been prepared solely for information purposes and is not an offering memorandum nor any other kind of an offer to buy or sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell any security, instrument or investment product or to participate in any particular trading strategy. It is not intended and should not be taken as any form of advertising, recommendation or investment advice. This information is confidential and for the use of the intended recipients only. The distribution of this document in Canada is restricted to recipients in certain Canadian jurisdictions who are eligible “permitted clients” for purposes of National Instrument 31-103 Registration Requirements, Exemptions and Ongoing Registrant Obligations.

NOTICE TO SOUTH AFRICAN INVESTORS

Investors should take cognisance of the fact that there are risks involved in buying or selling any financial product. Past performance of a financial product is not necessarily indicative of future performance. The value of financial products can increase as well as decrease over time, depending on the value of the underlying securities and market conditions. The investment value of a financial product is not guaranteed and any Illustrations, forecasts or hypothetical data are not guaranteed, these are provided for illustrative purposes only. This document does not constitute a solicitation, invitation or investment recommendation. Prior to selecting a financial product or fund it is recommended that South Africa based investors seek specialised financial, legal and tax advice. GQG PARTNERS LLC is a licensed financial services provider with the Financial Sector Conduct Authority (FSCA) of the Republic of South Africa, with FSP number 48881.

NOTICE TO UNITED KINGDOM INVESTORS

GQG Partners is not an authorised person for the purposes of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 of the United Kingdom (“FSMA”) and the distribution of this document in the United Kingdom is restricted by law. Accordingly, this document is provided only for and is directed only at persons in the United Kingdom reasonably believed to be of a kind to whom such promotions may be communicated by a person who is not an authorised person under FSMA pursuant to the FSMA (Financial Promotion) Order 2005 (the “FPO”). Such persons include: (a) persons having professional experience in matters relating to investments; and (b) high net worth bodies corporate, partnerships, unincorporated associations, trusts, etc. falling within Article 49 of the FPO. The services provided by GQG Partners and the investment opportunities described in this document are available only to such persons, and persons of any other description may not rely on the information in it. All, or most, of the rules made under the FSMA for the protection of retail clients will not apply, and compensation under the United Kingdom Financial Services Compensation Scheme will not be available.

GQG Partners (UK) Ltd. is a company registered in England and Wales, registered number 1175684. GQG Partners (UK) Ltd. is an appointed representative of Sapia Partners LLP, which is a firm authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (“FCA”) (550103).
© 2023 GQG Partners LLC. All rights reserved. This document reflects the views of GQG as of June 2023.TLFLI MDI0623